Cargando Video
     
Thursday, July 05, 2007
Perspectives

MiningWatch Response to Open Letters

Joan Kuyek at MiningWatch Canada responds to open letters from Ruben Naichap of the Shuar Federation of Zamora Chinchipe and Jose Aviles of the Ecuador Amazon Indigenous Nationalities Confederation.
Mining creates poverty for local communities in the long term, rather than long-term prosperity, argues  Joan Kuyek, MiningWatch Canada. (Photo: MiningWatch Canada)

Poll

Does mining have a positive effect on Latin America? Results / Other Polls

BY JOAN KUYEK

These accusations are baseless and untrue and they represent libel against our organisation. They maliciously attack not only MiningWatch Canada but also those people and organizations in Ecuador that have expressed legitimate concerns about mining.

You are clearly unfamiliar with our organization and have [...] apparently been misled regarding our principles and our operations. It is unfortunate that you did not make use of your visit to Canada to meet with our staff, directors, or member organizations, as you would have been able to clear up the misconceptions and misinformation reflected in your letter. Certainly your own credibility would have been better served if you had done so; nonetheless you are welcome to communicate directly with us to eliminate future misunderstandings, or to read our published material in print or on our web site, www.miningwatch.ca.

MiningWatch Canada is a small organisation dedicated to research and advocacy. Our role, reflected on our web site and in all our published materials, is to ensure that the impacts occasioned by mining can be fully considered by the people who are being affected, and to ensure that policies and practices are adopted by governments and the mining industry to protect the environmental, indigenous rights, workers’ rights, human rights, including economic, social, and cultural rights. To this end we commonly work with the mining industry and our Government in multi-stakeholder initiatives. We respond to requests from assistance from communities and organisations working with them who are affected by Canadian mining operations to provide independent information and to help them communicate with others in similar situations, find technical assistance, and assert their rights. We are not a funding agency; we do not undertake development projects or provide financial support to other organisations or communities, nor have we requested or been given any funding for any work in southern Ecuador.

In the case of southern Ecuador, we have provided independent information, otherwise not available in Canada, have given voice to local people who have expressed concerns about the impacts of mining on the forests and ecosystems, and have tried to make sure that the world knows about the conflicts that the proposed mining development has occasioned.

Mining has short-term benefits and very long-term impacts and risks that need to be carefully evaluated by the communities that will be affected by them. Because mining frequently entails serious environmental and social costs, we believe that affected communities and peoples have the right to Free Prior Informed Consent – the right to make their own decisions regarding development projects, free of coercion. We know how desperate indigenous communities are for capital and knowledge that will help them feed their people and develop strong economies. However, you should be aware that there is a world-wide debate about whether mining has the ability to facilitate this. In fact, most research – including findings from the World Bank Extractive Industries Review (2003) – leads to the conclusion that mining-dependent regions are poorer than regions without mining, and that mining creates poverty for local communities in the long term, rather than long-term prosperity. We have investigated this in some detail, and our research can be found in "No Rock Unturned", unfortunately available only in English.

The Shuar people have clearly not profited to date from petroleum development, as they still live in desperate poverty. Why should they expect that mining will be different?

Our role as a critical mining industry analyst does not mean that we are opposed to all mining projects – only those that impose an unacceptable and unjustifiable cost to the environment, human rights, and the economic, social, and cultural well-being of the affected communities, including taking advantage of and/or exacerbating conflict of any kind. We will continue to conduct research, provide uncompromised and constructive criticism of the mining industry, and stand in solidarity with communities affected by mining, Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal alike.

Once again, I would welcome the opportunity to address your misapprehensions directly.

Sincerely,
Joan Kuyek,
National Coordinator

EDITOR'S NOTE: This column is based on open letters from MiningWatch Canada to Ruben Naichap of the Shuar Federation of Zamora Chinchipe and Jose Aviles of the Ecuador Amazon Indigenous Nationalities Confederation.

Post Your Comments
You can write a comment on this article by clicking here.

From: Pippa Jeffcock

Ecuador
I should like to ask Mz Kuyek to name some of the projects to which her organisation are not opposed. It would enable us to understand what it is that her organisation thinks is acceptable because to an outsider it looks like nothing is good enough. Secondly I should like to ask her if she drives a car and if she owns a laptop computer or a cell phone. Is she prepared to do without them? Is her house made of wood? If there were no bricks or mortar or slate, how many trees does she imagine would still be standing? Mining is essential to modern life and preserves far more forests than it cuts down. I repeat, which projects does her organisation support? We'd like to know.

From: José

Ecuador
Opposition in the south-eastern part of my country is massive. It involves indigenous organizations, peasants, mayors, and even members of the congress.

From: Esteban Alvarez

Ecuador
As a concerned Ecuadorian I must agree with Ms. Jeffcock. I have witnessed the perverse media handling of so-called environmental groups down here who are fed and supported by NGO's such as MiningWatch which pretends 'to enlighten' us idiots so we may decide for ourselves. Why doesn't MiningWatch focus on Canada and let us try to deal with our many needs and problems.

  Other articles in : Perspectives
Back to Perspectives