Cargando Video
     
Monday, October 15, 2007
Perspectives

Bush: Free Trade Benefits US Workers

Free trade agreements with Peru, Panama and Colombia will level the playing fields for businesses, workers, and farmers in the US.
CONSUMER BENEFIT: Free trade with Latin America benefits consumers, President George W. Bush said in Miami last week. (Photo: Eric Draper/The White House)
FLOURISHING TIES: Presidents George W. Bush of the United States and Alvaro Uribe of Colombia, pictured here in Bogota in March, have boosted ties.  (Photo: Eric Draper/The White House)

BY GEORGE W. BUSH

One of the pivotal issues facing our country is expanding trade and investment. (...) It's a timely message because Congress has some important decisions coming up. I made my mind about the importance of trade and investment, and now Congress is going to have to make up its mind about trade and investment -- especially when it comes to free trade agreements with Peru, Panama and Colombia. These agreements will level the playing fields for businesses, workers, and farmers here in the United States. These agreements will help our friends in neighborhoods and help them lift them out of poverty. These agreements will counter the false populism promoted by some nations in the hemisphere. These agreements will strengthen the forces of freedom and democracy throughout the Americas. I urge the congressional leaders to pass these three Latin American agreements as soon as possible. (...)

FROM KENNEDY TO CLINTON

Expanding trade and investment has been a commitment -- longstanding commitment of the United States. I'm not the first President to ever stand up and say we need to expand trade. As a matter of fact, Presidents from Eisenhower to Kennedy, to Reagan and Clinton have worked to seize the opportunities of free and fair trade. Opening up foreign markets for America's goods and services has been a high priority for my administration. In January 2001, America had free trade agreements in force with just three countries. Now we have agreements in force with 14 countries -- including seven in Latin America. (...)

The results of the agreements are beginning to come in, and they're proving the critics wrong. In the four years since we implemented a free trade agreement with Chile, American exports to that country have more than doubled. In the four years since we implemented a free trade agreement with Singapore, American exports to that country have increased by about 50 percent. And in just one year since we began implementing a free trade agreement with Central America and the Dominican Republic, American exports to that region have grown by 13 percent.

And meanwhile, U.S. economy has continued to grow, and job expansion has been strong, and hourly wages are on the rise, and the job market for college graduates is bright. When trade expands, American workers gain, because our workers are making products for people around the world who want to buy products that say "Made in the USA."

LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD

Congress now has an opportunity to build on the success by passing new free trade agreements with Peru, Colombia, and Panama. Today, all three of these countries enjoy duty-free access to U.S. markets for virtually all their products. They're shipping their goods our way, and most of those products enter America duty free. Yet when we ship our products their way, most of our products face significant tariffs. Our free trade agreements would knock down many of these barriers -- and level the playing field for our businesses and farmers and workers. Together, these agreements would expand access to 75 million new customers with a combined GDP of $245 billion. This May, my administration and Democratic leaders in Congress came together to forge a bipartisan consensus to consider these trade deals. And now it is the time to move forward with these pro-growth, pro-democracy agreements.

And the stakes are high. As Congress debates, people across the hemisphere are watching to see if America will uphold its commitment to free and fair trade. In a recent letter to congressional Democrats, former Secretary Shalala (...) and dozens of her Democratic colleagues wrote this: "Latin America is up for grabs. We fully recognize that asking the United States Congress to vote on these trade agreements is politically charged. Nonetheless, rejecting these agreements would set back regional U.S. interests for a generation. We must not walk away now."

Others who signed the letter include former Senators Bob Graham, Sam Nunn, and Bennett Johnson [sic], as well as many others from the Clinton administration. Those who signed the letter are absolutely correct. Members of both parties in Congress should view these trade agreements for what they are -- an historic opportunity to strengthen our economy at home, and advance democracy and prosperity throughout our hemisphere. And Congress should approve these agreements soon, so that people across the Americas can see the benefits.

PERU: GREATER OPPORTUNITIES 

The first new Latin American trade agreement that my administration completed is with Peru. This agreement has great promise, because Peru has one of the fastest growing economies in South America. Last year alone, Peru's economy expanded by 8 percent. And with greater prosperity in both our countries, trade between the United States and Peru has doubled over the past three years.

The free trade agreement with Peru would ignite even greater opportunities for both our nations. It would be especially beneficial to businesses and workers and farmers here at home. The free trade agreement would immediately eliminate most of Peru's industrial tariffs, as well as many of the barriers to U.S. agriculture exports. It would also provide new market access and fair treatment to U.S. companies that provide services and invest in Peru. Here's what that would mean. If you're a Miami company exporting electronics to Peru, you would go from paying thousands of dollars in tariffs on the products you shipped to no tariff at all. In other words, your product would become more competitive. It would make it more likely you'd be able to sell into a new market. It would instantly make the products affordable. It would give a business person more money to invest here at home. The workers would be more likely able to keep their jobs.

A free trade agreement with Peru would strengthen our partnership with an important democracy in South America. Last year, Peru held two rounds of free and fair elections. And through their representatives, the Peruvian people have made it clear they want to increase their ties to the United States. The Peruvian legislature passed the free trade agreement by an overwhelming margin. And now the United States Congress should show America's commitment in return -- by passing the Peru agreement quickly, and with a strong bipartisan majority.

COLOMBIA: STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE

The second of the new Latin American trade agreements that my administration completed is with Colombia. Colombia is home to 44 million potential customers -- more than the population of Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and North Carolina put together. After years of hardship, Colombia's economy is strong and growing -- with 6.8 percent expansion last year alone. Colombia is now our fifth largest trading partner in Latin America. And Colombia is the largest market for U.S. agricultural exports in South America.

The free trade agreement would open up Colombia's growing economy to our producers. It would immediately eliminate tariffs on more than 80 percent of American industrial and consumer goods exports. It would provide significant new duty-free access for American crops. The effects would be far-reaching. In Colombia, families would enjoy higher standards of living -- thanks to more affordable American products and more reliable access to our markets. Here at home, about 8,000 U.S. companies that export to Colombia would find new buyers for their goods and services. And for the first time in history, they would be able to compete in Colombia on a level playing field.

The strategic implications of this agreement are as important as the economic benefits. Colombia is one of America's strongest allies in the Western Hemisphere. It has been under assault by a formidable network of terrorists and drug traffickers, which has put its democracy at risk. In recent years, Colombia's democratically elected President has taken courageous steps to stop drug traffickers, and rein in paramilitary groups, and enforce the law.

The United States has supported President Uribe's efforts through an initiative called Plan Colombia, which was launched by President Bill Clinton and strongly supported by my administration. The results are striking. Since 2000, kidnappings and terrorist attacks and murders have all dropped substantially. Convictions have increased. Colombia has extradited hundreds of drug traffickers and terrorists to the United States. And the Colombian people are taking back their country from the narco-terrorists.

Some in Congress have expressed concern over violence in Colombia, particularly attacks on trade unionists. President Uribe takes these concerns seriously, and he has responded decisively. He's established an independent prosecutors unit to investigate and punish homicides against labor unionists. He's allowed the International Labor Organization to station a permanent representative in Bogota. He's worked to offer young Colombians better alternatives to a life of violence and drugs -- including the new jobs and economic opportunities that would come from a trade agreement with the United States.

Colombia's record is not perfect, but the country is clearly headed in the right direction -- and is asking for our help. Both houses of the Colombian legislature have expressed overwhelming support for the trade agreement with the United States. And now they're waiting to see if we will uphold our end of the deal. If Congress were to reject this committed ally, we would damage America's credibility in the region, and make other countries less willing to cooperate in the future. As Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada put it, "If the United States turns its back on its friends in Colombia, this will set back our cause far more than any Latin American dictator could hope to achieve." By its bold actions, Colombia has proved itself worthy of America's support -- and I urge Congress to pass this vital agreement as soon as possible.

PANAMA: VIBRANT RELATIONSHIP

The third of the new Latin American trade agreements that my administration completed is with Panama. Panama has the fastest-growing economy in Central America, with a growth rate of more than 8 percent last year. Our nations have strong ties, dating back to the construction of the Panama Canal. Trade has always been a key part of our relationship. Last year alone, our nations exchanged nearly $3 billion worth of goods.

The free trade agreement with Panama will build on this vibrant trade relationship. It will immediately eliminate tariffs on 88 percent of our industrial and consumer goods exports to Panama. It will open a new market for American farmers and ranchers, including fruit growers here in Florida. It will increase access to Panama's service sector, including its key financial services market. It will open opportunities for American businesses to participate in the Panama Canal expansion project. This is a good agreement, and we will continue to work closely with Congress and the government of Panama to address the issues necessary to get it approved.

Collectively, these three trade agreements have the potential to boost our economy, and strengthen our allies, and spread prosperity throughout our region. We want people to be prosperous in our neighborhood. It's in the interests of the United States that prosperity spread throughout the -- Latin America and South America. (Applause.) And yet, many of our citizens feel uneasy about competition, and they worry that trade will cost jobs. You know, I understand why. I understand that if you're forced to change a job halfway through a career it can be painful for your family. I know that. And that is why I'm a big believer in trade adjustment assistance that helps Americans make the transition from one job to the next.

In other words, I believe there is a role for the federal government, and that is when a person loses a job because of trade, there's help for that person and family -- help to get that person a new education -- the community college system, for example, to be able to train that person for jobs which actually exist. Additional college enhances a worker's productivity. And when your productivity is enhanced, so your wages go up. And so rather than focus on only on the risks of the negative, I think it's important for this country to focus on the much larger benefits of trade. We'll help those whose -- lost a job because of trade. But it's important for our country to understand trade yields prosperity, and prosperity means people will more likely be able to find work.

MORE CHOICES FOR CONSUMERS

In the debate ahead, members of Congress should keep in mind the American businesses and workers and farmers who will gain, who will benefit from a level playing field for their goods and services. They should keep in mind that American consumers will enjoy more choices, and better prices that come with trade. They should keep in mind the millions in our hemisphere who will be lifted out of poverty. And above all, members of Congress should have confidence in the ability of the United States to compete in the world. And they should show that confidence by approving these trade agreements with bipartisan votes. (...)

All of this will bring us closer to a world that lives in liberty, a world that grows in prosperity, a world that trades in freedom. Here in our hemisphere, that means an Americas where democratic nations work together to advance peace and justice and security; where the opportunity to succeed is as real in Lima as in Los Angeles, in Bogota as in Boston; where the opportunity for people to realize dreams is just as real in Panama City, Panama, as it is in Panama City, Florida. (...)

George W. Bush is the president of the United States of America. This column is based on an edited excerpt of his remarks at an October 12 event in Miami organized by the University of Miami's Center for Hemispheric Policy and the Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce.  

Post Your Comments
You can write a comment on this article by clicking here.

From: Chester Beans

Canton, Ohio
I and some others don't really understand free trade. What is
free trade when one country, like China ,sells more to US than
they buy from us? More US dollars are going overseas then
coming back. I think free trade should be based on equal benifits
to all countries involved. How can Chinese residents buy US
made goods with their paltry paychecks compared to ours. It
only seems free trade laws only benefit them.

From: Lisa

California
This only states how we will benefit, but really, how bad off are we now? Look at the farmers and businesses in Peru and Colombia. Are they needing U.S goods to smother their market? Can Colombia not grow all of its own food? Yes it can. We should not be sending our goods to cut the poor Colombian farmers off. We should support them and not try to trick the people here in the U.S to think we are actually helping democracy in Latin America.

From: JOSHUA PALMISON

DANIA FLORIDA
I think free trade with the Americas would greatly improve our business and our economy.

This article has 4 comments. See all >>

  Other articles in : Perspectives
Back to Perspectives