Thursday, September 2 2010 Updated at 8AM.

 
You are not logged in | Log in
Perspectives 12:00 AM
Monday, January 07, 2008
Latin Logistics Needs Competitiveness
Panama, represented by Manzanillo International Terminal (top), is best in Latin America when it comes to logistics, but ranks 53 places behind Singapore (above), according to the World Bank. (Photos: MIT and Singapore Ministry of Information, Communications and the Arts)
      
Latin America urgently needs to implement reforms to boost trade facilitation or else lag behind.

BY JOHN MURPHY
AND TARA GALVIN
 

If the nations of Latin America and the Caribbean needed one more warning that they are lagging in the global competition with China and other Asian dynamos, it arrived in the usually innocuous form of a World Bank report in early November.  Entitled Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, the report included a novel Logistics Performance Index (LPI) providing an in-depth, cross-country assessment of trade logistics and supply chain performance. 

What is trade logistics, and why does it matter?  Trade logistics is shorthand for the range of services and processes involved in moving merchandise from one country to another — “from customs procedures, logistics costs, and infrastructure quality to the ability to track and trace shipments, timeliness in reaching destination, and the competence of the domestic logistics industry,” as the World Bank study puts it.  With international trade growing relative to GDP — the value of exports and imports combined is equivalent to 28 percent of GDP in the United States, 68 percent in Mexico, and 83 percent in Chile — the efficiency of trade logistics becomes extremely important.

To the surprise of many, China outperformed every single country in Latin America and the Caribbean on the LPI.  This is remarkable on several fronts, not least because China has a per capita income and other development indicators that lag well behind many of Latin America’s middle income countries.  Along with China, six other economies in developing Asia — Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea, Malaysia, and Thailand — also ranked ahead of every single Latin American or Caribbean country included in the index.  Mexico came in at 56 and Brazil at 61, placing them behind the majority of European and Asian economies.  (The United States achieved a ranking of 14th in the LPI.)

Competition in today’s global economy has laid bare the cost of inefficient trade logistics.  Studies have shown that inefficiencies in customs and ports in Latin America and the Caribbean add anywhere from 5 percent to 25 percent to the cost of trade.  At a time when the average import tariff in the region has fallen to about 10 percent, the cost of inefficient customs and ports looms as a highly significant barrier to trade. 

THE TRADE FACILITATION AGENDA  

From a business perspective, why does the field of trade logistics matter?  Three reasons stand out — cost, speed, and reliability.  Reforms in this sector — often dubbed trade facilitation — include measures to make the flow of trade cheaper, faster, and more reliable by making customs and ports procedures more efficient. 

The business community agrees strongly with the findings of the World Bank and other researchers in academia.  In September, the Association of American Chambers of Commerce in Latin America (AACCLA), whose 23 member AmChams represent over 80 percent of U.S. investment in Latin America and the Caribbean, released results from a survey of its members examining issues of importance for the upcoming year.  More than 500 business leaders in 22 countries took part in the survey.

The results represent a call to action.  Fully 62 percent of respondents rated trade facilitation reforms as the highest priority — ahead of a dozen other business priorities, including such critical issues as approval of pending trade agreements, fighting counterfeiting and piracy, and securing treaties to avoid double taxation.  In short, trade facilitation is an urgent priority for the Americas.

Traditionally, the trade facilitation agenda has focused on customs procedures and requirements, port efficiency, infrastructure quality, the overall regulatory environment, automation and e-business usage.  The World Bank report suggests that policymakers should add to this agenda measures to liberalize services markets to ensure that quality, competitive private services are available in sectors such as trucking, warehousing, and customs brokerage.

COST, SPEED AND RELIABILITY

Of all the factors recommending trade facilitation as a reform priority, cost is at the fore.  In the World Bank’s widely praised Doing Business 2008 report, the costs of trading across borders are provided for 178 countries.  Throughout Latin America, these costs are unusually high, especially when juxtaposed with developing Asian markets. 

For example, in Mexico the cost to import one 20-foot container is $2,411 and to export is $1,302.  Looking at Brazil, the import cost is $1,240 and the export cost is $1,090.  By contrast, in China and Singapore, the import cost per container is $430 and $367, and the export cost is $390 and $416, respectively.  Chile stands out as a leader in Latin America with an import cost of $685 and an export cost of $645 per container.  With this cost disparity, it becomes clear why these Latin American economies are having difficulty competing.

The speed of trade logistics is equally critical, and again the comparison with Asia is unflattering for Latin America and the Caribbean.  According to Doing Business 2008, the

average time for containers to clear customs and other procedures in South America is 25.8 days for imports and 22.2 days for exports.  Compare this to the world leader, Singapore, where imports average three days and exports average five days to clear customs. 

“Speed to market” matters a great deal in today’s global marketplace.  However, the Doing Business report suggests that most Latin American and Caribbean economies are squandering a potential advantage over Asian rivals.  The region’s relative proximity to the U.S., Canadian, and European markets is a key competitive advantage over Asia, but it’s being squandered. 

Linking cost and speed is reliability, the importance of which is highlighted by the Connecting to Compete report.  When looking to improve the reliability of trade logistics, it is crucial to look at a country’s logistics services broadly.  In this vein, the report suggests that policymakers should add to the traditional trade facilitation agenda measures to liberalize services markets.  Doing so helps ensure that quality, competitive logistics services are available.  Greater reliability in the supply chain contributes to greater direct investment, opportunities for diversification in the export market, and an overall stronger and more competitive trade environment. 

It’s worth noting that advances in the liberalization of services are among the many virtues of the recent free trade agreements.  El Salvador’s former economy minister Miguel Ernesto Lacayo commented frequently during the campaign for approval of the U.S.-Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA) that the agreement would imply 15 years’ worth of economic reform.  By combining reforms in customs with trade capacity building and services liberalization as well as greater respect for the rule of law, the recent U.S. free trade agreements do precisely what the World Bank report prescribes.

THE VIEW OF TRADE LOGISTICS CUSTOMERS  

Outside of the trade logistics and transportation industries themselves, customers of these services are also paying more attention to the importance of trade facilitation.  Jeanne Broad, Director of International Trade at General Motors Corporation, has made the argument for a greater focus on trade facilitation reforms in the context of Latin America’s largest market, Brazil: 

“Although Brazil has made substantial progress in modernizing its customs processes, transaction costs remain substantially higher in Brazil thank in the United States.  For example, GM Brazil has over 70 service workers, representing a cost of over $4 million a year, processing imports and exports.  Of those, nine are devoted to soliciting customs declarations from suppliers so that GM Brazil can prepare certificates of origin to qualify for trade preference programs.  These nine are focusing on about 10,000 parts, while, in comparison, GM Europe has just 2.5 people soliciting declarations for 200,000 parts.”  Unfortunately, this example is not unique to the automotive industry or Brazil. 

For the huge number of firms across the economy that rely on the trade logistics sector to get their products to market, Broad points out that there is consensus on a remarkable number of priority reforms.  These include:

  • Enhancing the use of technology in order to cut down on the number of transaction papers;
  • Harmonizing the data requirements for exports and import declaration;
  • Reviewing the bond guarantee requirements on goods which are released early; and
  • Expediting border clearance times for low-risk imports.

 A GLOBAL CHALLENGE 

For policymakers and business leaders seeking a roadmap to reform, the good news is that the way has been prepared.  The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) process has made good on trade facilitation promises and allowed its 21 member economies to win the benefits of increased trade.  This was demonstrated by the success of the APEC Trade Facilitation Action Plan, which was launched in 2002. 

Underscoring the usefulness of specific, outcome-tied goals, APEC ministers met the target established Action Plan of a 5 percent reduction in transaction costs (a rough analogue to trade logistics) in just three years. The APEC economies are currently working to achieve another five 5 percent reduction within a few years.  The business community is keen to replicate this process in the Americas (beyond the five Western Hemisphere members of APEC).

One place for Latin America and the Caribbean to start is ratification and implementation of the revised Kyoto Convention, which provides for the simplification and harmonization of customs procedures.  The convention is one of the major international instruments developed by the World Customs Organization, and it is recognized as an international standard by the global customs community.  Unfortunately, while more than 50 countries have ratified the convention, not one country in Latin America or the Caribbean has done so, though some, such as Chile, are estimated to be in compliance with more than two-thirds of its provisions.

Today, Latin America and the Caribbean face the imperative of overcoming the disconnect between expressions of support for trade facilitation and the region’s stalled attempts putting these reforms into practice.  The good news is that the challenge can be met, and the payoff could be both large and quick.  But in an increasingly competitive world, there’s no time to dawdle. 

John Murphy is Vice President for International Affairs at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Executive Vice President of the Association of American Chambers of Commerce in Latin America (AACCLA).  Tara Galvin is Director for Western Hemisphere Affairs at the Chamber.They wrote this column for Latin Business Chronicle.

  © Copyright Latin Business Chronicle

  

Related News:
- Trade: Panama Best, Venezuela Worst - Competitiveness: CAFTA Best - Latin America: Strategy for Competitiveness- Improving U.S.-Mexican Competitiveness - Slow Customs Means Lost Capital - Logistica: Falta Competitividad
 

Post Your Comments
You can write a comment on this article by clicking here.

There are no comments on this article. If you wish, you can write one.

  Other articles in : Perspectives  
Argentina: Ten Reforms for Cristina
Reduce Chavez Oil, Help Latin Neighbors
Evaluating Nestor Kirchner
Ecuador: Keeping Up With Hugo
Brazil Tax: Uncertain Reform
Venezuela: Still Negative Outlook
Prosperity & Weak Property Rights
LatAm Finance Lags Asia
Haiti Makes Real Progress
Colombia FTA Next?
Dealing With Latin Populists
Cristina's Short Honeymoon
Flores: LatAm Must Fight For Freedom
Uruguayan Farce
New President, New Policies
Cristina and the U.S: No Change
Chile’s Energy Crisis: No Magical Solution
Latin America's Downside: Competitiveness
Costa Rica's Free Trade Victory
Bush: Free Trade Benefits US Workers
Latin FTAs: What Will Congress Do?
CAFTA's Impact On Costa Rica
Costa Rica & CAFTA: What Next?
Latin America: Good Outlook
What's Driving Brazil M&A?
Boosting Singapore-Latin Ties
Costa Rica’s CAFTA Choice
Is Ecuador's Correa Following Chavez?
Will Raul Reform Cuba's Economy?
FTA Failure, Chavez' Gain
Open Letter to Congressional Democrats
Global Outlook: Implications for LatAm
Exhausting Democracy in Ecuador
Improved Logistics Key For LatAm
China Safety and Latin America
Singapore: Latin America's Asian Partner
PDVSA's Grave Has Been Dug
Canada's Exports to South America Booming
Costa Rica's CAFTA Referendum
Latin America's Inflation Success
Dangerous Policies for Latin America
Latin America’s Energetic August
Brazil & Mexico Prepared For Contagion
U.S. Relations with Latin America
Nicaragua and Esso: What Will Happen?
Brazil's Crisis: Could It Happen Again?
Brace for Snapback
North American Summit: More or Less?
Sean Penn and Hugo Chavez
Argentina: Pack Your Bags
Banco Azteca & Brazil:  Good Outlook
Closing the Gap in Latin Infrastructure
Ecuador: Getting Ugly
Latin America: Adios to Market Reforms?
China, Taiwan and the Battle for Latin America
Brazil Auto Boom: Can Supply Keep Pace?
Brazil: Vivo Hurts Competition?
Latin America's Educational Challenge
After the IPO: Redecard's Outlook
Drummond: Charges Were False
Drummond Case: Effects on Latin Business?
Ethanol Push: Pork Barrel Boondoggle
Mexican Infrastructure: More Competitiveness?
Gustavo Cisneros: No Deal With Chavez
CFIUS and Latin American Companies
Hutchison No Threat to Panama
Canada's Renewed Commitment to Latin America
Argentina: New Energy Policies?
Cristina's Travels
Venezuela: In the Hands of the State
MiningWatch Response to Open Letters
Ecuador: Mining Reduces Poverty
Support Colombia With FTA
Kirchner: Nothing Lasts Forever
Venezuela Oil: Who Will Fill The Void?
Argentina’s Energy Tango
Ecuador Hurts Its Potential
Unfair Treatment of Colombia
Open Letter To MiningWatch Canada
After RCTV: End of Solidarity?
Middle East and Latin America: Same Errors?
Sizzling Brazil
Bearish on China, Bullish on Latin America
Mexico: More Media Competition?
Argentina: Waiting for Cristina
Venezuela's Trade Limbo
Costa Rica: A Real Business Guide
After Costa Rica: More China Success?
Latin America: Strategy for Competitiveness
Supporting Small Business in Latin America
Chávez Conditionality
China Undermines U.S. in Latin America
Brazil Corruption Scandal: Impact On Lula?
Argentina's Environmental Hypocrisy
Colombia: Bad Policy Decisions
Venezuelan Intrusion in Bolivia
Brazil: Nuclear Energy?
Central America: Common Ground
Approve Colombia FTA Now
Colombia Infrastructure Needs Attention
Improving U.S.-Mexican Competitiveness
Thinking Out of the Box
Brazil Wireless: Competition Continues 
Democrats and Free Trade
Argentina: Running the Clock
Mexico Needs China Policy
Ecuador Referendum and Business
Mexican Acquisition of TIM?
Neighbors Have Shared Responsibilities
Colombia: Construction Drives Growth
Argentina on Kirchner's Time
Latin America At the Crossroads
Two Cheers for U.S. Ethanol Initiative
Fiscal Reform in Mexico
Commentary: Price Controls Boost Inflation
Brazil: Anti-American Foreign Policy?
Latin Left: Authoritarian & Undemocratic
Venezuela Oil: Wiped Out!
Venezuela: Instability & Isolation
Argentina: Lessons for Ecuador
Colombia's Strong Business Record




















 
 
Home | About Us | Contact Us
Developed by Merit Designs
Merit Designs