Thursday, September 2 2010 Updated at 8AM.

 
You are not logged in | Log in
Perspectives 12:00 AM
Monday, July 28, 2008
Remittances Fall, Flows Realign
CLICK TO ENLARGE
      
Despite an expected contraction in remittances to Latin America, there are also opportunities for growth for transfer companies.

BY JAN SMITH


Worker remittances to Mexico from the United States are down 2.9 percent, totaling $5.4 billion, during the first quarter of 2008 ascompared to the same period in 2007.  Mexico frequently serves as a barometer for the region because it  accounts for nearly half of the  region’s remittances.  First quarter figures are not surprising in light of a softening of growth during 2007, but the ever increasing severity of deceleration in the US economy could actually make 2008 the first year on-record where remittances post negative growth.

Single-digit growth was recorded for 2007 in large part due to a contraction of the construction market in the United States.  Job cuts during 2008 are already being felt in sectors where Latin Americans are heavily, albeit often informally, employed.  This will negatively impact the ability and willingness to send monies home.  Remittances could well contract by 3 percent-8 percent for 2008. 

VULNERABLE

Latin American labor is particularly vulnerable to swings in the U.S. economy.  Kroll-InfoAmericas’ studies show that fully half of all remittance senders in the United States do not have formal migratory status.  This group is the first to face job cuts.  In 2007 this was most felt in the construction industry.  This year, higher fuel costs and an eroding dollar are squeezing the average household’s ability to employ domestic help and home maintenance.  This is a less monitored, yet very significant swath of the Latin American workforce in the United States.

Unemployment among workers of Hispanic or Latin American origin in the United States grew 17 percent from December 2007 to March 2008.  At 6.9 percent, it is over 35 percent the national average of 5.1 percent reported by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.  The Mexican Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI) estimates 400,000 Mexican enter the United States each year seeking jobs.  This contingent represents about half of all informal labor entering the United States from Latin America and is not considered in official labor statistics.  Although employment options are diminishing, this will likely impact only the remittance flows and not the number of workers in the USA.

The pressure to seek job opportunities in the US is not winding down.  A review of Mexican labor statistics for 2008 shows a likely increase in the unemployed labor base between 10,000 to 40,000 workers.  Informal workers are also unwilling to return home at the first signs of distress.  First, they modify their saving habits and eat into the remittances they usually send home.

CHANGING PATTERNS

Initial findings presented by the Thomas Riviera Institute show that informal workers plan to reduce the number of remittances they send home in 2008 by 10 percent-20 percent.  In compensation, they are increasing the value of their remittances by 5 percent and increasing the reliance on informal channels, avoiding higher fees and commissions. 

A study commissioned by the Federation of Latin American Banks (FELABAN) in late 2007 revealed that although 70 percent of migrant workers reported increased difficulty finding employment in today’s economy, only 10 percent reported unemployment, and 68 percent found jobs within three months.  This points to a high resiliency and capacity to remain in the US despite a downturn in the labor market.   Indeed, less than 20 percent of migrant works plan to leave the United States in the next 24 months, and of those who do, only 17 percent state lack of work as the main reason.  Most workers state nostalgia, distance from family, and the desire to acquire a home as the main reasons for returning.

Kroll-InfoAmericas studies of the U.S.-Hispanic mortgage market reveal an estimated 300,000 Hispanics will acquire U.S. citizenship in the next five years and seek a mortgage with an average value of $204,000.  This group tends to be conservative and seek standard complying mortgages.  The real-estate boom of the last few years priced most homes beyond the means of this group, but falling real estate prices will likely afford some latitude. The average migrant worker reports a monthly income of $1,600, of which nearly one fifth is used for remittances.  As Latin Americans remain in the United States longer, their monthly salary increases.  Combining remittances with rent it is conceivable for this group to strike monthly payments close to $1,000.

ENDURING CONTRACTION

Such behavioral patterns point to a redistribution of remittance monies while employment patterns recover.  The remittance industry is mature enough to endure a contraction in 2008 and even in 2009.  It is likely that informal channels will grow in importance during this contraction, ameliorating the true impact to the industry, although making the actual dip in remittances difficult to accurately measure.  This may seem like difficult scenario for money transfer operations and banks to operate in, but it actually creates opportunities.  One such example are pre-paid cards, providing a less costly alternative to remittances that can be transported personally, yet offering more safety than cash.  Identifying these opportunities, as well as understanding how remittances re-direct themselves through the US financial system as a consequence of changing acculturation patterns, will continue to offer remittance players growth scenarios despite an expected contraction in the market.

This article is republished with permission from Tendencias, the magazine of Kroll InfoAmericas. 

 

 

Post Your Comments
You can write a comment on this article by clicking here.

There are no comments on this article. If you wish, you can write one.

  Other articles in : Perspectives  
Argentina: Ten Reforms for Cristina
Reduce Chavez Oil, Help Latin Neighbors
Evaluating Nestor Kirchner
Ecuador: Keeping Up With Hugo
Brazil Tax: Uncertain Reform
Venezuela: Still Negative Outlook
Prosperity & Weak Property Rights
LatAm Finance Lags Asia
Haiti Makes Real Progress
Colombia FTA Next?
Dealing With Latin Populists
Cristina's Short Honeymoon
Flores: LatAm Must Fight For Freedom
Uruguayan Farce
New President, New Policies
Cristina and the U.S: No Change
Chile’s Energy Crisis: No Magical Solution
Latin America's Downside: Competitiveness
Costa Rica's Free Trade Victory
Bush: Free Trade Benefits US Workers
Latin FTAs: What Will Congress Do?
CAFTA's Impact On Costa Rica
Costa Rica & CAFTA: What Next?
Latin America: Good Outlook
What's Driving Brazil M&A?
Boosting Singapore-Latin Ties
Costa Rica’s CAFTA Choice
Is Ecuador's Correa Following Chavez?
Will Raul Reform Cuba's Economy?
FTA Failure, Chavez' Gain
Open Letter to Congressional Democrats
Global Outlook: Implications for LatAm
Exhausting Democracy in Ecuador
Improved Logistics Key For LatAm
China Safety and Latin America
Singapore: Latin America's Asian Partner
PDVSA's Grave Has Been Dug
Canada's Exports to South America Booming
Costa Rica's CAFTA Referendum
Latin America's Inflation Success
Dangerous Policies for Latin America
Latin America’s Energetic August
Brazil & Mexico Prepared For Contagion
U.S. Relations with Latin America
Nicaragua and Esso: What Will Happen?
Brazil's Crisis: Could It Happen Again?
Brace for Snapback
North American Summit: More or Less?
Sean Penn and Hugo Chavez
Argentina: Pack Your Bags
Banco Azteca & Brazil:  Good Outlook
Closing the Gap in Latin Infrastructure
Ecuador: Getting Ugly
Latin America: Adios to Market Reforms?
China, Taiwan and the Battle for Latin America
Brazil Auto Boom: Can Supply Keep Pace?
Brazil: Vivo Hurts Competition?
Latin America's Educational Challenge
After the IPO: Redecard's Outlook
Drummond: Charges Were False
Drummond Case: Effects on Latin Business?
Ethanol Push: Pork Barrel Boondoggle
Mexican Infrastructure: More Competitiveness?
Gustavo Cisneros: No Deal With Chavez
CFIUS and Latin American Companies
Hutchison No Threat to Panama
Canada's Renewed Commitment to Latin America
Argentina: New Energy Policies?
Cristina's Travels
Venezuela: In the Hands of the State
MiningWatch Response to Open Letters
Ecuador: Mining Reduces Poverty
Support Colombia With FTA
Kirchner: Nothing Lasts Forever
Venezuela Oil: Who Will Fill The Void?
Argentina’s Energy Tango
Ecuador Hurts Its Potential
Unfair Treatment of Colombia
Open Letter To MiningWatch Canada
After RCTV: End of Solidarity?
Middle East and Latin America: Same Errors?
Sizzling Brazil
Bearish on China, Bullish on Latin America
Mexico: More Media Competition?
Argentina: Waiting for Cristina
Venezuela's Trade Limbo
Costa Rica: A Real Business Guide
After Costa Rica: More China Success?
Latin America: Strategy for Competitiveness
Supporting Small Business in Latin America
Chávez Conditionality
China Undermines U.S. in Latin America
Brazil Corruption Scandal: Impact On Lula?
Argentina's Environmental Hypocrisy
Colombia: Bad Policy Decisions
Venezuelan Intrusion in Bolivia
Brazil: Nuclear Energy?
Central America: Common Ground
Approve Colombia FTA Now
Colombia Infrastructure Needs Attention
Improving U.S.-Mexican Competitiveness
Thinking Out of the Box
Brazil Wireless: Competition Continues 
Democrats and Free Trade
Argentina: Running the Clock
Mexico Needs China Policy
Ecuador Referendum and Business
Mexican Acquisition of TIM?
Neighbors Have Shared Responsibilities
Colombia: Construction Drives Growth
Argentina on Kirchner's Time
Latin America At the Crossroads
Two Cheers for U.S. Ethanol Initiative
Fiscal Reform in Mexico
Commentary: Price Controls Boost Inflation
Brazil: Anti-American Foreign Policy?
Latin Left: Authoritarian & Undemocratic
Venezuela Oil: Wiped Out!
Venezuela: Instability & Isolation
Argentina: Lessons for Ecuador
Colombia's Strong Business Record




















 
 
Home | About Us | Contact Us
Developed by Merit Designs
Merit Designs