Thursday, September 2 2010 Updated at 8AM.

 
You are not logged in | Log in
Perspectives 12:00 AM
Monday, August 31, 2009
Ecuador Judge, Official in Bribe Scandal
A still image from the video showing Judge Juan Núñez and Juan Pablo Novoa. (Photo: Courtesy of Chevron)
      
A government party official asks for a $3 million bribe to him, Correa and a judge to hand out environmental remediation contracts.

EDITOR'S NOTE: Chevron today released a statement about a video recording that shows an official from Ecuador's ruling party asking for a $3 million bribe in a case involving the country's president Rafael Correa and the judge in a environmental lawsuit against the U.S. oil company. Due to the explosive nature of the information, Latin Business Chronicle is republishing the entire statement from Chevron. For the full transcripts and the complete video recordings, go to the special Ecuador page set up by Chevron.

Chevron Corp. (NYSE:CVX) today provided authorities in Ecuador and the U.S. with video recordings that reveal a $3 million bribery scheme implicating the judge presiding over the environmental lawsuit currently pending against the company and individuals who identify themselves as representatives of the Ecuadorian government and its ruling party.   In the videos, the judge confirms that he will rule against Chevron and that appeals by the energy company will be denied – even though the trial is ongoing and evidence is still being received. A purported party official also states that lawyers from the executive branch have been sent to assist the judge in writing the decision.

The recorded meetings also show an individual who claims to be a representative of Ecuador’s ruling political party, Alianza PAIS, seeking $3 million in bribes in return for handing out environmental remediation contracts to two businessmen after the verdict is handed down. Of that sum, he said $1 million would go to Judge Juan Núñez, $1 million would go to “the presidency” and $1 million to the plaintiffs.

The video-taped meetings occurred in May and June of 2009. Two of the meetings took place at the Quito offices of Alianza PAIS, one meeting took place in the judge’s chambers in Lago Agrio, and a second meeting involving the judge took place in a Quito hotel.

After referring the evidence of the scheme to authorities, Chevron Executive Vice President Charles James said that company lawyers will seek the disqualification of the judge in the case and annulment of his prior rulings.

“Chevron has consistently asserted that the case has involved improper complicity between the plaintiffs and Ecuador’s executive branch and other legal irregularities,” James said. “These video recordings raise additional serious questions about corruption, executive branch interference and prejudgment of the case that demand a full investigation. No judge who has participated in meetings of the type shown on these tapes could possibly deliver a legitimate decision.”

Evidence of the bribery plot was brought to Chevron’s attention in June by an Ecuadorian, who was pursuing business opportunities in Ecuador with an American businessman. The Ecuadorian, Diego Borja, has performed work for Chevron as a logistics contractor. Borja also has a relative who works as a contractor to Chevron. The American, Wayne Hansen, has no relationship to Chevron. Since the time that the recordings came into Chevron’s possession, the company has made extensive efforts to authenticate and preserve the information.

Borja and Hansen recorded their meetings in Ecuador without Chevron’s knowledge, and neither man was paid to provide the recordings to Chevron. Because of concern for Borja’s safety, Chevron has assisted him and his family with relocation expenses and other interim support.

“We are calling upon Ecuadorian authorities to conduct a full investigation of this matter – focusing not only on the conduct of Judge Núñez, but also on the very serious indications of political interference in this case,” James said. “Given the highly sensitive nature of this information and our concerns about the rule of law in Ecuador, we felt compelled to put this entire matter into the public domain as a check against retaliation or further unlawful conduct as it relates to the case there. We also believe that public disclosure will encourage a deeper investigation of these matters by appropriate officials within Ecuador.”

On May 11, Borja and Hansen attended a meeting at the Quito offices of Alianza PAIS where they were introduced to Patricio Garcia, who represented himself as an official with the party. Later, Garcia arranged for Borja and Hansen to fly to Lago Agrio for a May 15 meeting with Judge Núñez. During the meeting, held in the judge’s chambers and recorded by Borja and Hansen, Judge Núñez stated that the government of Ecuador, not the plaintiffs, would receive the funds earmarked for remediation produced by the judgment against Chevron.

Subsequently, Borja and Hansen met with Judge Núñez at a Quito hotel on June 5. Attending the meeting was Juan Pablo Novoa, who represented himself as legal counsel for government officials.

During the meeting, Judge Núñez answered a series of questions about the case from the businessmen, who were seeking assurances the court proceedings would generate business. Novoa stated that “we have the political power” to direct remediation contracts and stressed the judge “is generating the work through the ruling.”  Novoa added, “The offer from the people in the government that I represent, I’m a delegate of them, so I’m accompanying the judge so that you can be serious about the case.” 

Judge Núñez confirmed that he would be issuing a ruling, the appeal would be a formality and the government would be handling the funds associated with remediation contracts. In a final exchange with the businessmen before the meeting ended, Judge Núñez revealed how he was planning to handle his ruling:

Núñez:          “Any other questions for me as a judge?”

Hansen: “Oh no, I, I know clearly how it is, you say, Chevron is the guilty party?”

Núñez:          “Yes Sir.”

Hansen: “And the, the, the act (decision) is October or November of this year?”

Núñez:          “Yes Sir.”

Hansen: “And it’s…?”

Núñez:          “No later than January.”

Hansen: “January 2010. And the money is twenty-seven (billion dollars)?”

Núñez:          “It might be less, and it might be more.”

The last recorded meeting regarding the bribes, in which Judge Núñez was not present, occurred June 22 at the Alianza PAIS office in Quito.  During the meeting, Garcia confirmed the details of the bribe:

Borja:          “OK. Of the three million … one million is for the judge?”

Garcia:         “Yes.”

Borja:          “One million for the presidency…?”

Garcia:         “Yes.”

Borja:          “And one million for the plaintiffs?”

Garcia:         “Yes, that’s right.”

Borja:          “But for the plaintiffs, who gets the money, man? Fajardo?”

Garcia:         “No. On this matter, we’re going to handle it here.”

Borja:          “You mean Alianza PAIS would receive the payment here?”

Garcia:         “Right.”

Related News:
- A New Low for Rafael Correa - Jackpot Justice Goes Global - Ecuador's Wrong Policies
 

Post Your Comments
You can write a comment on this article by clicking here.

There are no comments on this article. If you wish, you can write one.

  Other articles in : Perspectives  
Argentina: Ten Reforms for Cristina
Reduce Chavez Oil, Help Latin Neighbors
Evaluating Nestor Kirchner
Ecuador: Keeping Up With Hugo
Brazil Tax: Uncertain Reform
Venezuela: Still Negative Outlook
Prosperity & Weak Property Rights
LatAm Finance Lags Asia
Haiti Makes Real Progress
Colombia FTA Next?
Dealing With Latin Populists
Cristina's Short Honeymoon
Flores: LatAm Must Fight For Freedom
Uruguayan Farce
New President, New Policies
Cristina and the U.S: No Change
Chile’s Energy Crisis: No Magical Solution
Latin America's Downside: Competitiveness
Costa Rica's Free Trade Victory
Bush: Free Trade Benefits US Workers
Latin FTAs: What Will Congress Do?
CAFTA's Impact On Costa Rica
Costa Rica & CAFTA: What Next?
Latin America: Good Outlook
What's Driving Brazil M&A?
Boosting Singapore-Latin Ties
Costa Rica’s CAFTA Choice
Is Ecuador's Correa Following Chavez?
Will Raul Reform Cuba's Economy?
FTA Failure, Chavez' Gain
Open Letter to Congressional Democrats
Global Outlook: Implications for LatAm
Exhausting Democracy in Ecuador
Improved Logistics Key For LatAm
China Safety and Latin America
Singapore: Latin America's Asian Partner
PDVSA's Grave Has Been Dug
Canada's Exports to South America Booming
Costa Rica's CAFTA Referendum
Latin America's Inflation Success
Dangerous Policies for Latin America
Latin America’s Energetic August
Brazil & Mexico Prepared For Contagion
U.S. Relations with Latin America
Nicaragua and Esso: What Will Happen?
Brazil's Crisis: Could It Happen Again?
Brace for Snapback
North American Summit: More or Less?
Sean Penn and Hugo Chavez
Argentina: Pack Your Bags
Banco Azteca & Brazil:  Good Outlook
Closing the Gap in Latin Infrastructure
Ecuador: Getting Ugly
Latin America: Adios to Market Reforms?
China, Taiwan and the Battle for Latin America
Brazil Auto Boom: Can Supply Keep Pace?
Brazil: Vivo Hurts Competition?
Latin America's Educational Challenge
After the IPO: Redecard's Outlook
Drummond: Charges Were False
Drummond Case: Effects on Latin Business?
Ethanol Push: Pork Barrel Boondoggle
Mexican Infrastructure: More Competitiveness?
Gustavo Cisneros: No Deal With Chavez
CFIUS and Latin American Companies
Hutchison No Threat to Panama
Canada's Renewed Commitment to Latin America
Argentina: New Energy Policies?
Cristina's Travels
Venezuela: In the Hands of the State
MiningWatch Response to Open Letters
Ecuador: Mining Reduces Poverty
Support Colombia With FTA
Kirchner: Nothing Lasts Forever
Venezuela Oil: Who Will Fill The Void?
Argentina’s Energy Tango
Ecuador Hurts Its Potential
Unfair Treatment of Colombia
Open Letter To MiningWatch Canada
After RCTV: End of Solidarity?
Middle East and Latin America: Same Errors?
Sizzling Brazil
Bearish on China, Bullish on Latin America
Mexico: More Media Competition?
Argentina: Waiting for Cristina
Venezuela's Trade Limbo
Costa Rica: A Real Business Guide
After Costa Rica: More China Success?
Latin America: Strategy for Competitiveness
Supporting Small Business in Latin America
Chávez Conditionality
China Undermines U.S. in Latin America
Brazil Corruption Scandal: Impact On Lula?
Argentina's Environmental Hypocrisy
Colombia: Bad Policy Decisions
Venezuelan Intrusion in Bolivia
Brazil: Nuclear Energy?
Central America: Common Ground
Approve Colombia FTA Now
Colombia Infrastructure Needs Attention
Improving U.S.-Mexican Competitiveness
Thinking Out of the Box
Brazil Wireless: Competition Continues 
Democrats and Free Trade
Argentina: Running the Clock
Mexico Needs China Policy
Ecuador Referendum and Business
Mexican Acquisition of TIM?
Neighbors Have Shared Responsibilities
Colombia: Construction Drives Growth
Argentina on Kirchner's Time
Latin America At the Crossroads
Two Cheers for U.S. Ethanol Initiative
Fiscal Reform in Mexico
Commentary: Price Controls Boost Inflation
Brazil: Anti-American Foreign Policy?
Latin Left: Authoritarian & Undemocratic
Venezuela Oil: Wiped Out!
Venezuela: Instability & Isolation
Argentina: Lessons for Ecuador
Colombia's Strong Business Record




















 
 
Home | About Us | Contact Us
Developed by Merit Designs
Merit Designs